Teeter v. Duncan
This text of 110 A.2d 54 (Teeter v. Duncan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The judgment of the Chancery Division of the Superior Court is affirmed as to the matters appealed from [41]*41for the reasons expressed in the opinion filed in that court by Judge Ewart and reported at 33 N. J. Super. 242.
We find no merit in the cross-appeal from the award of counsel fees. The trustees raised the question of the construction of the will in their complaint and there was clearly reasonable doubt as to its meaning. We affirm the trial court’s decision on this point.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
110 A.2d 54, 17 N.J. 40, 1954 N.J. LEXIS 178, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/teeter-v-duncan-nj-1954.