Teeter v. Duncan

110 A.2d 54, 17 N.J. 40, 1954 N.J. LEXIS 178
CourtSupreme Court of New Jersey
DecidedDecember 13, 1954
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 110 A.2d 54 (Teeter v. Duncan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Teeter v. Duncan, 110 A.2d 54, 17 N.J. 40, 1954 N.J. LEXIS 178 (N.J. 1954).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The judgment of the Chancery Division of the Superior Court is affirmed as to the matters appealed from [41]*41for the reasons expressed in the opinion filed in that court by Judge Ewart and reported at 33 N. J. Super. 242.

We find no merit in the cross-appeal from the award of counsel fees. The trustees raised the question of the construction of the will in their complaint and there was clearly reasonable doubt as to its meaning. We affirm the trial court’s decision on this point.

For affirmance — Chief Justice Yanderbilt, and Justices Heher, Oliphant, Wacheneeld, Burling, Jacobs and Brennan — Y For reversal — None.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In Re Estate of Pfizer
110 A.2d 54 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1954)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
110 A.2d 54, 17 N.J. 40, 1954 N.J. LEXIS 178, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/teeter-v-duncan-nj-1954.