Teese Cotton Co. v. Rains
This text of 1915 OK 924 (Teese Cotton Co. v. Rains) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Opinion by
This cause comes on upon a motion of defendant in error to dismiss the appeal for the reason that the case-made was not served within the time allowed by the trial judge, and for the reason that no briefs have been filed by the plaintiff in error. The record discloses that on June 6, 1913, the trial court extended the time within which plaintiff in error was to make and serve case-made to 60 days from that date, and thereafter and within said 60 days extended such time 30 additional days. The case-made was served on counsel for defendant in error on September 6, 1913; the time for serving same having expired on September 4, 1913. For this reason we are without jurisdiction to review this case upon the case-made. No briefs having been filed by *504 plaintiff in error, our attention is not challenged to any error in the record, and we have not. been able to discover any.
The appeal should therefore be dismissed.
By the Court: It is so ordered.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
1915 OK 924, 153 P. 63, 52 Okla. 503, 1915 Okla. LEXIS 313, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/teese-cotton-co-v-rains-okla-1915.