Teele v. Fonda

7 Johns. 251
New York Supreme Court·Decided November 15, 1810·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The evidence is full and complete, that when the defendant bought and purchased the lot in question, on the 19th of December, 1806, the whole lot was claimed by deed, by persons under a title hostile and adverse to the title then set up by Ogden; that the lands, for the value of which the plaintiff has taken a verdict, were then under actual cultivation, and possessed under such adverse title ; and that all this was known to the defendant at the time of his purchase, and that he purchased with a view of contesting at law, the title set up by the persons in possession, There is no ground whatever to set aside the verdict, and the motion must be denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Teele v. Fonda, 7 Johns. 251 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1810).

7 Johns. 251 (Teele v. Fonda) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

De Garmo v. . Phelps
68 N.E. 873 (New York Court of Appeals, 1903)
Galbraith v. Payne
96 N.W. 258 (North Dakota Supreme Court, 1903)
Cassedy v. Jackson
45 Miss. 397 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1871)
Vrooman v. Shepherd
14 Barb. 441 (New York Supreme Court, 1852)
Whitaker v. Cone
2 Johns. Cas. 58 (New York Supreme Court, 1800)