Teel v. Huffman

21 Tex. 781
CourtTexas Supreme Court
DecidedJuly 1, 1858
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 21 Tex. 781 (Teel v. Huffman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Texas Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Teel v. Huffman, 21 Tex. 781 (Tex. 1858).

Opinion

Roberts, J.

This is an action to try the title to a tract of land.

Plaintiff below claims the land under a patent. The defendant below claims under a pre-emption settlement. When, he applied to the Surveyor, and proposed to make the necessary affidavit, and obtain his survey, the patent had already issued. And although eight months had not then expired from the time of his settlement, he suffered it to expire without presenting such affidavit to the Surveyor and demanding a survey, or adopting any such legal proceedings as would secure his right to the survey, and none such have yet been resorted to by him, so that his right depends simply on his possession. Such possession gives no right to the land, further than a mere right of prefererence to acquire the title during the eight months. And if he neglect to take the proper steps, during the time allowed by law, and in fact never does take any such steps, his preference is lost; and any antagonist claim, though inferior to his originally, may, by being diligently pursued and perfected, become superior to his. The defendant also contends that plaintiff must recover upon the strength of his own title, and that the patent is void. The objections taken to the patent are mere irregularities, which do not go to the foundation of the plaintiff’s right; and if the defendant had fully shown such objections, they would [783]*783not avail him, unless he had shown some right in himself to the land. The patent is prima facie a good title. There being nothing shown which makes it void absolutely, the defendant must oppose it by some superior right, which has not been done in this case.

The questions involved in this case have been too often decided to require a reference to authority.

Judgment aErmecL

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Wood v. Collins
60 F. 139 (Fifth Circuit, 1894)
Vance v. Lindsey
60 Tex. 286 (Texas Supreme Court, 1883)
Young v. O'Neal
54 Tex. 544 (Texas Supreme Court, 1881)
Todd v. Fisher & Miller
26 Tex. 239 (Texas Supreme Court, 1862)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
21 Tex. 781, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/teel-v-huffman-tex-1858.