Teeft v. Buffalo Dry Dock Co.
147 A.D. 918, 131 N.Y.S. 1146
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided November 15, 1911·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
Judgment and order affirmed, with costs. All concurred, except McLennan, P. J., who dissented upon the ground that the defendant was not shown guilty of actionable negligence, and that the plaintiff assumed the risk of the employment.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Teeft v. Buffalo Dry Dock Co., 147 A.D. 918, 131 N.Y.S. 1146 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1911).
147 A.D. 918 (Teeft v. Buffalo Dry Dock Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Carberry v. Acme Transit Co.
203 F. 780 (W.D. New York, 1913)