Tedla v. Ellman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Tedla v. Ellman

253 A.D. 764, 300 N.Y.S. 1051, 1937 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5497

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided December 24, 1937·Published

Opinion

Consolidated actions. One action was brought by Mary Bachek, as administratrix, to recover damages for the death of her intestate as the result of injuries received when struck by an automobile as he was trundling a baby carriage, filled with wood and junk, on a public highway. The other action was brought by Anna Tedla to recover damages for personal injuries received in the same accident and while she was pushing a baby carriage similarly loaded, and by her husband to recover for medical expenses and loss of services. Judgments in favor of plaintiffs and orders denying motion to set aside the verdicts unanimously affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Present —■ Hagarty, Davis, Adel, Taylor and Close, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Consolidated actions. One action was brought by Mary Bachek, as administratrix, to recover damages for the death of her intestate as the result of injuries received when struck by an automobile as he was trundling a baby carriage, filled with wood and junk, on a public highway. The other action was brought by Anna Tedla to recover damages for personal injuries received in the same accident and while she was pushing a baby carriage similarly loaded, and by her husband to recover for medical expenses and loss of services. Judgments in favor of plaintiffs and orders denying motion to set aside the verdicts unanimously affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Present —■ Hagarty, Davis, Adel, Taylor and Close, JJ.

Tedla v. Ellman, 253 A.D. 764, 300 N.Y.S. 1051, 1937 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5497 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1937).

Pincite

253 A.D. 764 (Tedla v. Ellman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.