Tedford v. Lichtenstein
This text of 129 A.D. 35 (Tedford v. Lichtenstein) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
It is clear that the record upon which an appeal is to be heard consists of the papers recited in the order appealed from as the papers upon which the same was granted. The question as to whether or not the record tiled in this court is the proper record is one which must be determined by this court and not by the Special Term. If the papers served are not those required by the General Rules of Practice, the respondent can move in this court to dismiss the appeal.
The order should be reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and the motion denied.
Present — Ingraham, McLaughlin, Clarke, Houghton and Scott, JJ.
Order reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
129 A.D. 35, 113 N.Y.S. 358, 1908 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1242, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tedford-v-lichtenstein-nyappdiv-1908.