Tedford v. Lichtenstein

129 A.D. 35, 113 N.Y.S. 358, 1908 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1242
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedDecember 11, 1908
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 129 A.D. 35 (Tedford v. Lichtenstein) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Tedford v. Lichtenstein, 129 A.D. 35, 113 N.Y.S. 358, 1908 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1242 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1908).

Opinion

Per Curiam:

It is clear that the record upon which an appeal is to be heard consists of the papers recited in the order appealed from as the papers upon which the same was granted. The question as to whether or not the record tiled in this court is the proper record is one which must be determined by this court and not by the Special Term. If the papers served are not those required by the General Rules of Practice, the respondent can move in this court to dismiss the appeal.

The order should be reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and the motion denied.

Present — Ingraham, McLaughlin, Clarke, Houghton and Scott, JJ.

Order reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Waldo v. Schmidt
62 Misc. 71 (New York Supreme Court, 1909)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
129 A.D. 35, 113 N.Y.S. 358, 1908 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1242, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tedford-v-lichtenstein-nyappdiv-1908.