Tedder v. State
306 So. 2d 488, 1974 Fla. LEXIS 4034
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Tedder v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 322 So. 2d 908 →
Opinions
The Petition for Writ of Certiorari reflected probable jurisdiction in this Court. We issued the Writ and have heard argument of the parties. After hearing argument and upon further consideration of the matter, we have determined that the Court is without jurisdiction. Therefore, the Writ must be and is hereby discharged and the Petition for Writ of Certiorari is dismissed.
It is so ordered.
ERVIN, J., dissents with opinion.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Tedder v. State, 306 So. 2d 488, 1974 Fla. LEXIS 4034 (Fla. 1974).
306 So. 2d 488 (Tedder v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Griffin v. Illinois
351 U.S. 12 (Supreme Court, 1956)
Tate v. Short
401 U.S. 395 (Supreme Court, 1971)
Fuller v. Oregon
417 U.S. 40 (Supreme Court, 1974)
Hardison v. State
450 S.W.2d 638 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1970)
Bernhardt v. State
288 So. 2d 490 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1974)
COMMERCE NAT. BANK IN LAKE WORTH v. Safeco Ins. Co.
284 So. 2d 205 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1973)
Larocco v. State
276 So. 2d 538 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1973)
Tedder v. State
287 So. 2d 330 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1973)