Tedder v. Riggin

65 Fla. 159
CourtSupreme Court of Florida
DecidedJanuary 15, 1913
StatusPublished

This text of 65 Fla. 159 (Tedder v. Riggin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Tedder v. Riggin, 65 Fla. 159 (Fla. 1913).

Opinion

On Rehearing.

Per Curiam.

A petition for rehearing has been filed herein upon the theory that the court- overlooked the contention of counsel as to the proper measure of damages applicable to this case.

The opinion clearly shows that this action is brought by a real estate agent one who assumed without authority to act. as agent for the owner of land, to recover the commissions the real estate agent expected to make under a contract made with the assumed. agent by procuring a purchaser of land. The assumed agent was not personal[160]*160ly bound on the contract; and the action was grounded on a breach of warranty of authority to make the contract which was made with an agent to sell for a commission, and not with an intended purchaser of the land. Under these circumstances authorities as to the measure of damages where an intended purchaser is the plaintiff or when the defendant is personally liable on the unauthorized contract are not relevant.

Rehearing denied.

Shackleford, C. J., and Taylor, Cockrell, Hocker and Whitfield, J. J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
65 Fla. 159, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tedder-v-riggin-fla-1913.