Tedder v. Johnson
This text of 583 F. App'x 276 (Tedder v. Johnson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Billy Joe Tedder appeals the district court’s judgment entered after a jury [277]*277found for the defendant on Tedder’s 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint in which he alleged excessive force. We have reviewed the record arid find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm. We deny Tedder’s motion for the preparation of a transcript at government expense, and his motion for appointment of counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
583 F. App'x 276, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tedder-v-johnson-ca4-2014.