Tedder v. Johnson
Opinion
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Billy Joe Tedder appeals the district court’s judgment entered after a jury [277] found for the defendant on Tedder’s 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint in which he alleged excessive force. We have reviewed the record arid find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm. We deny Tedder’s motion for the preparation of a transcript at government expense, and his motion for appointment of counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
583 F. App'x 276 (Tedder v. Johnson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.