Tedder v. City of Fort Pierce

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Tedder v. City of Fort Pierce

333 So. 2d 506, 1976 Fla. App. LEXIS 15159

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedMay 28, 1976

DocketNo. 75-2053

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 333 So. 2d 506 (Tedder v. City of Fort Pierce) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Tedder v. City of Fort Pierce, 333 So. 2d 506, 1976 Fla. App. LEXIS 15159 (Fla. Ct. App. 1976).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Upon review and consideration of the briefs and record on appeal we are of the opinion that plaintiffs’ cause of action against the individual employees of the City of Fort Pierce was not barred by the one year limitation applicable to cities and villages as prescribed in sec. 95.24, F.S. Insofar as those defendants other than the City of Fort Pierce are concerned the four year limitation period set forth in sec. 95.-11(4), F.S., is applicable. Accordingly, the order granting defendant’s motion to dismiss plaintiffs’ amended complaint and the final judgment rendered thereon are affirmed insofar as it relates to the City of Fort Pierce, defendant, and reversed insofar as it relates to the individual defendant-employees of the City of Fort Pierce.

AFFIRMED, in part; REVERSED, in part.

WALDEN, C. J., and CROSS and MA-GER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Upon review and consideration of the briefs and record on appeal we are of the opinion that plaintiffs’ cause of action against the individual employees of the City of Fort Pierce was not barred by the one year limitation applicable to cities and villages as prescribed in sec. 95.24, F.S. Insofar as those defendants other than the City of Fort Pierce are concerned the four year limitation period set forth in sec. 95.-11(4), F.S., is applicable. Accordingly, the order granting defendant’s motion to dismiss plaintiffs’ amended complaint and the final judgment rendered thereon are affirmed insofar as it relates to the City of Fort Pierce, defendant, and reversed insofar as it relates to the individual defendant-employees of the City of Fort Pierce.

AFFIRMED, in part; REVERSED, in part.

WALDEN, C. J., and CROSS and MA-GER, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

333 So. 2d 506, 1976 Fla. App. LEXIS 15159, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tedder-v-city-of-fort-pierce-fladistctapp-1976.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack