Tedder v. City of Fort Pierce

333 So. 2d 506, 1976 Fla. App. LEXIS 15159
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided May 28, 1976·No. No. 75-2053·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Upon review and consideration of the briefs and record on appeal we are of the opinion that plaintiffs’ cause of action against the individual employees of the City of Fort Pierce was not barred by the one year limitation applicable to cities and villages as prescribed in sec. 95.24, F.S. Insofar as those defendants other than the City of Fort Pierce are concerned the four year limitation period set forth in sec. 95.-11(4), F.S., is applicable. Accordingly, the order granting defendant’s motion to dismiss plaintiffs’ amended complaint and the final judgment rendered thereon are affirmed insofar as it relates to the City of Fort Pierce, defendant, and reversed insofar as it relates to the individual defendant-employees of the City of Fort Pierce.

AFFIRMED, in part; REVERSED, in part.

WALDEN, C. J., and CROSS and MA-GER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Tedder v. City of Fort Pierce, 333 So. 2d 506, 1976 Fla. App. LEXIS 15159 (Fla. Ct. App. 1976).

333 So. 2d 506 (Tedder v. City of Fort Pierce) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Davis v. Tedder
388 So. 2d 278 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1980)