Ted William Reemtsma v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas

Ted William Reemtsma v. State

DecidedAugust 10, 2006

Docket02-05-00429-CR

StatusPublished

This text of Ted William Reemtsma v. State (Ted William Reemtsma v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Ted William Reemtsma v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2006).

Pincite

Opinion

COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 2-05-429-CR

TED WILLIAM REEMTSMA APPELLANT

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS STATE

------------

FROM THE 372ND DISTRICT COURT OF TARRANT COUNTY

MEMORANDUM OPINION^{^[1]}

Ted William Reemtsma appeals the trial court=s judgment revoking his community supervision for felony driving while intoxicated. In a single issue, appellant complains that the trial court erred by ordering him to pay a $1000 fine as a condition of parole. The State concedes that the trial court was without authority to order repayment of a fine as a condition of parole.^{^[2]} Accordingly, we sustain appellant=s issue and modify the trial court=s judgment to omit the provision in the judgment requiring appellant to pay a $1000 fine as a condition of parole.^{^[3]} We affirm the trial court=s judgment as modified.^{^[4]}

PER CURIAM

PANEL F: CAYCE, C.J.; WALKER and MCCOY, JJ.

DO NOT PUBLISH

Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b)

DELIVERED: August 10, 2006

^{^[1]}See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.

^{^[2]}See Slaughter v. State, Nos. 02-04-00050-CR, 02-04-00051-CR, 2005 WL 183142, at *1 (Tex. App.CFort Worth Jan. 27, 2005, no pet.) (mem. op.) (not designated for publication); Green v. State, Nos. 02-03-00377-CR, 02-03-00397-CR, 2005 WL 78326, at *4 (Tex. App.CFort Worth Jan. 13, 2005, no pet.) (mem. op.) (not designated for publication) (both holding same).

^{^[3]}Belt v. State, 127 S.W.3d 277, 281 (Tex. App.CFort Worth 2004, no pet.); Green, 2005 WL 78326, at *4.

^{^[4]}See Tex. R. App. P. 43.2(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 2-05-429-CR

TED WILLIAM REEMTSMA APPELLANT

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS STATE

------------

FROM THE 372ND DISTRICT COURT OF TARRANT COUNTY

MEMORANDUM OPINION^{^[1]}

Ted William Reemtsma appeals the trial court=s judgment revoking his community supervision for felony driving while intoxicated. In a single issue, appellant complains that the trial court erred by ordering him to pay a $1000 fine as a condition of parole. The State concedes that the trial court was without authority to order repayment of a fine as a condition of parole.^{^[2]} Accordingly, we sustain appellant=s issue and modify the trial court=s judgment to omit the provision in the judgment requiring appellant to pay a $1000 fine as a condition of parole.^{^[3]} We affirm the trial court=s judgment as modified.^{^[4]}

PER CURIAM

PANEL F: CAYCE, C.J.; WALKER and MCCOY, JJ.

DO NOT PUBLISH

Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b)

DELIVERED: August 10, 2006

^{^[1]}See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.

^{^[2]}See Slaughter v. State, Nos. 02-04-00050-CR, 02-04-00051-CR, 2005 WL 183142, at *1 (Tex. App.CFort Worth Jan. 27, 2005, no pet.) (mem. op.) (not designated for publication); Green v. State, Nos. 02-03-00377-CR, 02-03-00397-CR, 2005 WL 78326, at *4 (Tex. App.CFort Worth Jan. 13, 2005, no pet.) (mem. op.) (not designated for publication) (both holding same).

^{^[3]}Belt v. State, 127 S.W.3d 277, 281 (Tex. App.CFort Worth 2004, no pet.); Green, 2005 WL 78326, at *4.

^{^[4]}See Tex. R. App. P. 43.2(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

Ted William Reemtsma v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ted-william-reemtsma-v-state-texapp-2006.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack