Ted Smith v. State of Florida
This text of Ted Smith v. State of Florida (Ted Smith v. State of Florida) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA
TED SMITH, NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND Petitioner, DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED
v. CASE NO. 1D15-1719
STATE OF FLORIDA,
Respondent.
___________________________/
Opinion filed May 22, 2015.
Petition for Writ of Certiorari -- Original Jurisdiction.
Ted Smith, pro se, Petitioner.
Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.
PER CURIAM.
Petitioner seeks review of the Order Dismissing Defendant’s Letter and
Affidavit for Modification of Conditional Release. To obtain certiorari review, a
petitioner must demonstrate a departure from the essential requirements of law,
resulting in an irreparable harm or harm that cannot be remedied on appeal. See West
Florida Regional Medical Center, Inc. v. See, 18 So. 3d 676 (Fla. 1st DCA 2009).
Here, the circuit court denied petitioner’s affidavit without prejudice to file a sufficient petition. Petitioner is at liberty to file a sufficient petition alleging grounds upon which
his conditional release may be modified as required by section 916.17(2), Florida
Statutes. Petitioner fails to demonstrate how this ruling results in irreparable harm.
Accordingly, the petition is denied.
THOMAS, MARSTILLER, and BILBREY, JJ. CONCUR.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Ted Smith v. State of Florida, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ted-smith-v-state-of-florida-fladistctapp-2015.