Ted Robertson v. Urita Emanuel
This text of Ted Robertson v. Urita Emanuel (Ted Robertson v. Urita Emanuel) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Dismissed and Opinion filed January 8, 2004.
In The
Fourteenth Court of Appeals
____________
NO. 14-03-01083-CV
TED ROBERTSON, Appellant
V.
URITA EMANUAL, Appellee
On Appeal from the 247th District Court
Harris County, Texas
Trial Court Cause No. 01-35725
M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N
This is an appeal from a judgment signed August 15, 2001. No clerk=s record has been filed. The clerk responsible for preparing the record in this appeal informed the court appellant did not make arrangements to pay for the record.
On December 3, 2003, notification was transmitted to all parties of the Court=s intent to dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution unless, within fifteen days, appellant paid or made arrangements to pay for the record and provided this court with proof of payment. See Tex. R. App. P. 37.3(b).
Appellant filed no response.
Accordingly, the appeal is ordered dismissed.
PER CURIAM
Judgment rendered and Opinion filed January 8, 2004.
Panel consists of Justices Edelman, Frost, and Guzman.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Ted Robertson v. Urita Emanuel, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ted-robertson-v-urita-emanuel-texapp-2004.