Tecuceanu v. Francisco Funeral Home, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Tecuceanu v. Francisco Funeral Home, Inc.

41 A.D.2d 671, 341 N.Y.S.2d 299, 1973 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5103

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedFebruary 20, 1973

StatusPublished

This text of 41 A.D.2d 671 (Tecuceanu v. Francisco Funeral Home, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Tecuceanu v. Francisco Funeral Home, Inc., 41 A.D.2d 671, 341 N.Y.S.2d 299, 1973 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5103 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1973).

Pincite

Opinion

In a negligence action.to recover damages for personal injuries sustained by plaintiff Bernard Tecuceanu and for loss of consortium, etc., sustained by his wife, plaintiffs Tecuceanu appeal, on the grour 1 of inadequacy, from so much of a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, entered May 16, 1972, as is against defendants upon a jury verdict of $20,000 for plaintiff Bernard Tecuceanu and $2,500 for plaintiff Miriam Tecuceanu. Judgment affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs. No opinion. Gulotta, Christ and Benjamin, JJ., concur; Hopkins, Acting P. J., and Brennan, J., dissent and vote to reverse the judgment insofar as appealed from and to grant a new trial between plaintiffs Tecuceanu and defendants on the issue of damages only, with the following memorandum: In our opinion, the conduct of counsel on the trial so obscured the .merits of the case that' a new trial is required in the interests of justice.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a negligence action.to recover damages for personal injuries sustained by plaintiff Bernard Tecuceanu and for loss of consortium, etc., sustained by his wife, plaintiffs Tecuceanu appeal, on the grour 1 of inadequacy, from so much of a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, entered May 16, 1972, as is against defendants upon a jury verdict of $20,000 for plaintiff Bernard Tecuceanu and $2,500 for plaintiff Miriam Tecuceanu. Judgment affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs. No opinion. Gulotta, Christ and Benjamin, JJ., concur; Hopkins, Acting P. J., and Brennan, J., dissent and vote to reverse the judgment insofar as appealed from and to grant a new trial between plaintiffs Tecuceanu and defendants on the issue of damages only, with the following memorandum: In our opinion, the conduct of counsel on the trial so obscured the .merits of the case that' a new trial is required in the interests of justice.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

41 A.D.2d 671, 341 N.Y.S.2d 299, 1973 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5103, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tecuceanu-v-francisco-funeral-home-inc-nyappdiv-1973.