Technologies Holdings Corp. v. Abatement Technologies, Inc.
This text of Technologies Holdings Corp. v. Abatement Technologies, Inc. (Technologies Holdings Corp. v. Abatement Technologies, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________
TECHNOLOGIES HOLDINGS CORP., Appellant,
v.
ABATEMENT TECHNOLOGIES, INC., Appellee. ______________________
2013-1661 ______________________
Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in Reexamination No. 95/001,362. ______________________
JUDGMENT ______________________
AARON T. OLEJNICZAK, Andrus, Sceales, Starke & Sawall, LLP, of Milwaukee, Wisconsin, argued for appel- lant. With him on the brief was GEORGE H. SOLVESON.
D. CLAY HOLLOWAY, Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton LLP, of Atlanta, Georgia, argued for appellee. With him on the brief were DEAN W. RUSSELL and RENAE BAILEY WAINWRIGHT. ______________________ THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is
ORDERED and ADJUDGED:
PER CURIAM (LOURIE, CLEVENGER, and REYNA, Circuit Judges). AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.
ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT
May 12, 2014 /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole Date Daniel E. O’Toole Clerk of Court
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Technologies Holdings Corp. v. Abatement Technologies, Inc., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/technologies-holdings-corp-v-abatement-technologies-inc-cafc-2014.