Technograph Printed Circuits, Ltd., and Technograph Printed Electronics, Incorporated v. Bendix Corporation
327 F.2d 497, 140 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 285, 1964 U.S. App. LEXIS 6690
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided January 17, 1964·No. 9085_1·Published·Cited by 38 cases
Opinion
After careful consideration of the record, the arguments and the briefs of counsel, we are persuaded that the patent claims are invalid for obviousness in the light of the prior art for the reasons fully discussed in the opinion of the District Court. Technograph Printed Circuits, Ltd. v. Bendix Aviation Corp., D.C. Md., 218 F.Supp. 1.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Technograph Printed Circuits, Ltd., and Technograph Printed Electronics, Incorporated v. Bendix Corporation, 327 F.2d 497, 140 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 285, 1964 U.S. App. LEXIS 6690 (4th Cir. 1964).
327 F.2d 497 (Technograph Printed Circuits, Ltd., and Technograph Printed Electronics, Incorporated v. Bendix Corporation) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Ab Iro v. Otex, Inc.
566 F. Supp. 419 (D. South Carolina, 1983)
Carpet Seaming Tape Licensing Corp. v. Best Seam Inc.
616 F.2d 1133 (Ninth Circuit, 1980)
Carpet Seaming Tape Licensing Corporation v. Best Seam Incorporated, Carpet Seaming Tape Licensing Corporation v. Vectron Industries, Inc. And Eugene J. Tasse
616 F.2d 1133 (Ninth Circuit, 1980)
True Temper Corporation, and Cross-Appellee v. Cf&i Steel Corporation, and Cross-Appellant
601 F.2d 495 (Tenth Circuit, 1979)
Sims v. MacK Trucks, Inc.
459 F. Supp. 1198 (E.D. Pennsylvania, 1978)
Duplan Corp. v. Deering Milliken, Inc.
444 F. Supp. 648 (D. South Carolina, 1977)
Kaiser Industries Corporation, a Nevada Corporation v. Jones & Laughlin Steel Corporation. Kaiser Industries Corporation, a Nevada Corporation v. Jones & Laughlin Steel Corporation
515 F.2d 964 (Third Circuit, 1975)
Kaiser Industries Corp. v. Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp.
515 F.2d 964 (Third Circuit, 1975)
Carter-Wallace, Inc. v. United States
496 F.2d 535 (Court of Claims, 1974)
Duplan Corporation v. Deering Milliken, Inc.
379 F. Supp. 388 (D. South Carolina, 1974)
Congoleum Industries, Inc. v. Armstrong Cork Company
366 F. Supp. 220 (E.D. Pennsylvania, 1973)
Technograph Printed Circuits, Ltd. v. Methode Electronics, Inc.
484 F.2d 905 (Seventh Circuit, 1973)
Lundy Electronics & Systems, Inc. v. Optical Recognition Systems, Inc.
362 F. Supp. 130 (E.D. Virginia, 1973)
Technograph Printed Circuits Ltd. v. Martin-Marietta Corp.
474 F.2d 798 (Fourth Circuit, 1973)
Technograph Printed Circuits, Ltd. v. Martin-Marietta Corp.
340 F. Supp. 423 (D. Maryland, 1972)
Shelco, Inc. v. Dow Chemical Company
322 F. Supp. 485 (N.D. Illinois, 1970)
Monsanto Company v. Rohm and Haas Company
312 F. Supp. 778 (E.D. Pennsylvania, 1970)
Malsbary Manufacturing Co. v. Ald, Inc.
310 F. Supp. 1112 (N.D. Illinois, 1970)
Carter-Wallace, Inc. v. Riverton Laboratories, Inc.
304 F. Supp. 357 (S.D. New York, 1969)