TECHNIPLEX ASSOCIATES, LLP v. VILLAGE EAST ROCHESTER

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided February 6, 2015·No. CA 14-00218·Published

Opinion

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

1367 CA 14-00218 PRESENT: SMITH, J.P., PERADOTTO, CARNI, VALENTINO, AND DEJOSEPH, JJ.

IN THE MATTER OF TECHNIPLEX ASSOCIATES, L.P., PETITIONER-RESPONDENT,

V MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

TOWN AND VILLAGE OF EAST ROCHESTER, RESPONDENTS-APPELLANTS. (APPEAL NO. 2.)

LACY KATZEN LLP, ROCHESTER (JOHN T. REFERMAT OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENTS-APPELLANTS.

WARD GREENBERG HELLER & REIDY LLP, ROCHESTER (DANIEL P. PURCELL OF COUNSEL), FOR PETITIONER-RESPONDENT.

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Monroe County (Matthew A. Rosenbaum, J.), entered October 24, 2013 in a proceeding pursuant to RPTL article 7. The order, among other things, granted the petitions in part and ordered respondents to correct the assessment rolls and to refund the tax overpayments with interest.

It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs.

Same Memorandum as in Matter of Techniplex III, a Partnership v Town & Vil. of E. Rochester ([appeal No. 1] ___ AD3d ___ [Feb. 6, 2015]).

Entered: February 6, 2015 Frances E. Cafarell Clerk of the Court

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

TECHNIPLEX ASSOCIATES, LLP v. VILLAGE EAST ROCHESTER, (N.Y. Ct. App. 2015).

TECHNIPLEX ASSOCIATES, LLP v. VILLAGE EAST ROCHESTER (TECHNIPLEX ASSOCIATES, LLP v. VILLAGE EAST ROCHESTER) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.