Tebbe v. Tebbe
24 S.W.3d 722, 2000 Mo. App. LEXIS 33, 2000 WL 14670
Opinion
ORDER
Wife appeals the trial court’s judgment of dissolution with respect to the division of marital property. We find the judgment is supported by substantial evidence, is not against the weight of the evidence, and does not erroneously declare or apply the law. Friedman v. Friedman, 965 S.W.2d 319, 322 (Mo.App.1998); see also Halupa v. Halupa, 943 S.W.2d 272, 277 (Mo.App.1997). An opinion rpciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value.
We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Tebbe v. Tebbe, 24 S.W.3d 722, 2000 Mo. App. LEXIS 33, 2000 WL 14670 (Mo. Ct. App. 2000).
24 S.W.3d 722 (Tebbe v. Tebbe) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Halupa v. Halupa
943 S.W.2d 272 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1997)
Friedman v. Friedman
965 S.W.2d 319 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1998)