Tebbe v. Tebbe
This text of 24 S.W.3d 722 (Tebbe v. Tebbe) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
ORDER
Wife appeals the trial court’s judgment of dissolution with respect to the division of marital property. We find the judgment is supported by substantial evidence, is not against the weight of the evidence, and does not erroneously declare or apply the law. Friedman v. Friedman, 965 S.W.2d 319, 322 (Mo.App.1998); see also Halupa v. Halupa, 943 S.W.2d 272, 277 (Mo.App.1997). An opinion rpciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value.
We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
24 S.W.3d 722, 2000 Mo. App. LEXIS 33, 2000 WL 14670, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tebbe-v-tebbe-moctapp-2000.