Teasley v. Nelson

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Teasley v. Nelson

148 S.E. 534, 39 Ga. App. 773, 1929 Ga. App. LEXIS 550

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedMay 20, 1929

Docket19388

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 148 S.E. 534 (Teasley v. Nelson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Teasley v. Nelson, 148 S.E. 534, 39 Ga. App. 773, 1929 Ga. App. LEXIS 550 (Ga. Ct. App. 1929).

Pincite

Opinion

Bell, J.

1. Detention by a proper officer under a valid warrant can not amount to false imprisonment. Page v. Citizens Banking Co., 111 Ga. 73 (7) (36 S. E. 418, (51 L. R. A. 463, 78 Am. St. R. 144). Even where the warrant is defective or void for want of jurisdiction, neither the party procuring it nor the officer executing it, if acting in good faith, is guilty of false imprisonment; the bona fides to be determined by the circumstances of each case. Civil Code (1910), § 4448.

2. Thus, where a convict, claiming that he had completed the servitude required by his sentence, applied to the judge of the superior court of the proper county for the writ of habeas corpus against the warden having him in custody, and on the hearing of the petition the writ was dismissed and the petitioner remanded to custody, the warden was not guilty of false imprisonment in holding the prisoner pending a review of the case by the Supreme Court, although the judgment of the trial court in such proceeding was erroneous, and was reversed by the Supreme Court. See Teasley v. Nelson, 164 Ga. 242 (138 S. E. 72). Such judgment was in the nature of a warrant, and was issued by a judicial officer having jurisdiction to issue it, and even if it could be said to have been defective so as to make the good faith of the warden an issue, there was in the present case no evidence that the warden acted in bad faith, and none tending in that direction was offered.

3. The plaintiff’s evidence failed to make a case of liability, and since the result would not have been different had the court admitted all of the evidence tendered, any possible error in the rejection of evidence was [774]*774immaterial. The court did not err in granting a nonsuit. McDonald v. Sowell, 129 Ga. 242, 244 (58 S. E. 860, 12 Ann. Cas. 701); Butler v. Tattnall Bank, 140 Ga. 579 (79 S. E. 456), and cit.

Decided May 20, 1929. William, E. & Gordon Mann, for plaintiff. J. A. McFarland, B. G. Pittman, W. M. Sapp, for defendant.

Judgment affirmed.

Jenkins, P. J., amd Stephens, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bell, J.

1. Detention by a proper officer under a valid warrant can not amount to false imprisonment. Page v. Citizens Banking Co., 111 Ga. 73 (7) (36 S. E. 418, (51 L. R. A. 463, 78 Am. St. R. 144). Even where the warrant is defective or void for want of jurisdiction, neither the party procuring it nor the officer executing it, if acting in good faith, is guilty of false imprisonment; the bona fides to be determined by the circumstances of each case. Civil Code (1910), § 4448.

2. Thus, where a convict, claiming that he had completed the servitude required by his sentence, applied to the judge of the superior court of the proper county for the writ of habeas corpus against the warden having him in custody, and on the hearing of the petition the writ was dismissed and the petitioner remanded to custody, the warden was not guilty of false imprisonment in holding the prisoner pending a review of the case by the Supreme Court, although the judgment of the trial court in such proceeding was erroneous, and was reversed by the Supreme Court. See Teasley v. Nelson, 164 Ga. 242 (138 S. E. 72). Such judgment was in the nature of a warrant, and was issued by a judicial officer having jurisdiction to issue it, and even if it could be said to have been defective so as to make the good faith of the warden an issue, there was in the present case no evidence that the warden acted in bad faith, and none tending in that direction was offered.

3. The plaintiff’s evidence failed to make a case of liability, and since the result would not have been different had the court admitted all of the evidence tendered, any possible error in the rejection of evidence was [774]*774immaterial. The court did not err in granting a nonsuit. McDonald v. Sowell, 129 Ga. 242, 244 (58 S. E. 860, 12 Ann. Cas. 701); Butler v. Tattnall Bank, 140 Ga. 579 (79 S. E. 456), and cit.

Decided May 20, 1929. William, E. & Gordon Mann, for plaintiff. J. A. McFarland, B. G. Pittman, W. M. Sapp, for defendant.

Judgment affirmed.

Jenkins, P. J., amd Stephens, J., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

148 S.E. 534, 39 Ga. App. 773, 1929 Ga. App. LEXIS 550, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/teasley-v-nelson-gactapp-1929.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack