Teasley v. Donahoe

Fourth Circuit

Teasley v. Donahoe

441 F. App'x 153

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

DecidedAugust 1, 2011

DocketNo. 11-1401

StatusPublished

This text of 441 F. App'x 153 (Teasley v. Donahoe) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Teasley v. Donahoe, 441 F. App'x 153 (4th Cir. 2011).

Pincite

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Mary Ann Teasley appeals the district court’s order dismissing her complaint filed pursuant to the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Teasley v. Donahoe, No. 1:11-cv-00196-AJT-JFA (E.D.Va. Mar. 21, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Mary Ann Teasley appeals the district court’s order dismissing her complaint filed pursuant to the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Teasley v. Donahoe, No. 1:11-cv-00196-AJT-JFA (E.D.Va. Mar. 21, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

441 F. App'x 153, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/teasley-v-donahoe-ca4-2011.