Teasley v. Donahoe

Fourth Circuit

Teasley v. Donahoe

441 F. App'x 153

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided August 1, 2011·No. No. 11-1401·Published

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Mary Ann Teasley appeals the district court’s order dismissing her complaint filed pursuant to the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Teasley v. Donahoe, No. 1:11-cv-00196-AJT-JFA (E.D.Va. Mar. 21, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Mary Ann Teasley appeals the district court’s order dismissing her complaint filed pursuant to the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Teasley v. Donahoe, No. 1:11-cv-00196-AJT-JFA (E.D.Va. Mar. 21, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Teasley v. Donahoe, 441 F. App'x 153 (4th Cir. 2011).

Pincite

441 F. App'x 153 (Teasley v. Donahoe) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.