Teasdale v. Jordan

Superior Court of North Carolina

Teasdale v. Jordan

3 N.C. 281

DecidedJune 15, 1803

StatusPublished

This text of 3 N.C. 281 (Teasdale v. Jordan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Superior Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Teasdale v. Jordan, 3 N.C. 281 (N.C. Ct. App. 1803).

Pincite

Opinion

teiul fay

Me y•;<■•/', Chlei Jncii'e,

to which Potter, Justice, assent.;.! 5 u K iu the discretkn te the court to peiacte'the ad:!:-, üon ol a plea at*ny time "before the trial j and the cocjl will PC suit the pies where the justice of thé case requires it. Ar.d ibe •dea not/ oiterte is sucu an one ao justice v. ciniits the admit.-; o;a oí. It wouid be ». Q'.oasrrú'is preposition that when ¿ted;-’ * wits, after pisa bríu uiLsn away ail the espeta, ths tx- cutoi oí :;i:!i::;jstr*ior should notwithstanding be compelled to an&v/ea dr; .kb;: test pisaded to.

The pie?, v/as addedo

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

teiul fay

Me y•;<■•/', Chlei Jncii'e,

to which Potter, Justice, assent.;.! 5 u K iu the discretkn te the court to peiacte'the ad:!:-, üon ol a plea at*ny time "before the trial j and the cocjl will PC suit the pies where the justice of thé case requires it. Ar.d ibe •dea not/ oiterte is sucu an one ao justice v. ciniits the admit.-; o;a oí. It wouid be ». Q'.oasrrú'is preposition that when ¿ted;-’ * wits, after pisa bríu uiLsn away ail the espeta, ths tx- cutoi oí :;i:!i::;jstr*ior should notwithstanding be compelled to an&v/ea dr; .kb;: test pisaded to.

The pie?, v/as addedo

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

3 N.C. 281, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/teasdale-v-jordan-ncsuperct-1803.