Tearpoak v. Tearpoak

85 Pa. Super. 470, 1925 Pa. Super. LEXIS 304
Superior Court of Pennsylvania·Decided May 6, 1925·No. Appeal, 225·Published·Cited by 7 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam,

The opinion of President Judge Shaper, of the common pleas, filed upon sustaining the motion of the plaintiff for judgment notwithstanding the verdict, fully vindicates the conclusion reached. There may be added to the decisions therein cited, Reese v. Philadelphia Trust Co., 218 Pa. 150 and Grady v. Sheehan, 256 Pa. 377.

The judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Tearpoak v. Tearpoak, 85 Pa. Super. 470, 1925 Pa. Super. LEXIS 304 (Pa. Ct. App. 1925).

85 Pa. Super. 470 (Tearpoak v. Tearpoak) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Balfour v. Seitz
140 A.2d 441 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1958)
Bohn v. FUND OF $1230.10.
116 A.2d 266 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1955)
Taylor v. Commercial Building & Loan Ass'n
182 A. 57 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1935)
Scanlon's Estate
169 A. 106 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1933)
In Re Estate of Eliza Gallagher, Dec'd.
167 A. 476 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1933)
In Re Estate of I.L. Crist
162 A. 478 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1932)
Disbro's Estate
16 Pa. D. & C. 165 (Susquehanna County Orphans' Court, 1930)