Teardo v. Teardo

461 So. 2d 276, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 114
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided January 3, 1985·No. 84-116·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

461 So.2d 276 (1985)

Gloria J. TEARDO, Appellant,
v.
Thomas F. TEARDO, et al., Appellees.

No. 84-116.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

January 3, 1985.

Edward Gay, Orlando, for appellant.

Michael J. Appleton, Graham, Marlowe & Appleton, Winter Park, for appellees Richard K. Buchanan and Allison H. Buchanan.

No appearance for appellee Thomas F. Teardo.

PER CURIAM.

Property held as an estate by the entireties is not subject to the lien of a judgment against one tenant alone. Winters v. Parks, 91 So.2d 649 (Fla. 1956); Vaughn v. Mandis, 53 So.2d 704 (Fla. 1951); State ex rel Molter v. Johnson, 107 FLa. 47, 144 So. 299 (1932); Ohio Butterine Company v. Hargrave, 79 Fla. 458, 84 So. 376 (1920); Liberman v. Kelso, 354 So.2d 137 (Fla. 2d DCA 1978); Bendl v. Bendl, 246 So.2d 574 (Fla. 3d DCA 1971). The rule applies when the judgment is for arrears in alimony due to an ex-wife as with any other judgment.

AFFIRMED.

ORFINGER, SHARP and COWART, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Teardo v. Teardo, 461 So. 2d 276, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 114 (Fla. Ct. App. 1985).

461 So. 2d 276 (Teardo v. Teardo) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In Re Cochrane
178 B.R. 1011 (D. Minnesota, 1995)
Sharp v. Hamilton
520 So. 2d 9 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1988)
Sharp v. Hamilton
495 So. 2d 235 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1986)