Teardo v. Teardo

461 So. 2d 276, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 114
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJanuary 3, 1985
Docket84-116
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 461 So. 2d 276 (Teardo v. Teardo) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Teardo v. Teardo, 461 So. 2d 276, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 114 (Fla. Ct. App. 1985).

Opinion

461 So.2d 276 (1985)

Gloria J. TEARDO, Appellant,
v.
Thomas F. TEARDO, et al., Appellees.

No. 84-116.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

January 3, 1985.

Edward Gay, Orlando, for appellant.

Michael J. Appleton, Graham, Marlowe & Appleton, Winter Park, for appellees Richard K. Buchanan and Allison H. Buchanan.

No appearance for appellee Thomas F. Teardo.

PER CURIAM.

Property held as an estate by the entireties is not subject to the lien of a judgment against one tenant alone. Winters v. Parks, 91 So.2d 649 (Fla. 1956); Vaughn v. Mandis, 53 So.2d 704 (Fla. 1951); State ex rel Molter v. Johnson, 107 FLa. 47, 144 So. 299 (1932); Ohio Butterine Company v. Hargrave, 79 Fla. 458, 84 So. 376 (1920); Liberman v. Kelso, 354 So.2d 137 (Fla. 2d DCA 1978); Bendl v. Bendl, 246 So.2d 574 (Fla. 3d DCA 1971). The rule applies when the judgment is for arrears in alimony due to an ex-wife as with any other judgment.

AFFIRMED.

ORFINGER, SHARP and COWART, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In Re Cochrane
178 B.R. 1011 (D. Minnesota, 1995)
Sharp v. Hamilton
520 So. 2d 9 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1988)
Sharp v. Hamilton
495 So. 2d 235 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1986)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
461 So. 2d 276, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 114, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/teardo-v-teardo-fladistctapp-1985.