Teanne Lynn Steinetz v. the State of Texas
This text of Teanne Lynn Steinetz v. the State of Texas (Teanne Lynn Steinetz v. the State of Texas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In the Court of Appeals Second Appellate District of Texas at Fort Worth ___________________________
No. 02-23-00058-CR No. 02-23-00059-CR ___________________________
TEANNE LYNN STEINETZ, Appellant
V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS
On Appeal from the 43rd District Court Parker County, Texas Trial Court Nos. CR21-0542, CR22-0237
Before Sudderth, C.J.; Wallach and Walker, JJ. Memorandum Opinion by Justice Wallach MEMORANDUM OPINION
Appellant Teanne Lynn Steinetz appeals1 from the trial court’s judgments of
conviction for the offenses of burglary of a building (appellate cause number 02-23-
00058-CR) and forgery of a financial instrument (appellate cause number 02-23-
00059-CR). See Tex. Penal Code Ann. §§ 30.02, 32.21. In each case, the trial court’s
certification of Steinetz’s right to appeal stated that the case involved a plea-bargain,
that Steinetz had no right of appeal, and that Steinetz had waived her right of appeal.
See Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(a)(2). Based on those certifications, we notified Steinetz that
her appeals would be dismissed unless, within ten days, she or any party desiring to
continue the appeals filed a response showing grounds for their continuance. See Tex.
R. App. P. 25.2(a)(2), (d), 44.3. More than ten days have passed, and we have not
received a response.
Steinetz is not appealing an adverse ruling on a written pretrial motion and
does not have the trial court’s permission to appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 25(a)(2), (d).
Accordingly, we dismiss her appeal for want of jurisdiction. See Tex. R. App. P.
25(a)(2), (d), 43.2(f); Roberts v. State, 508 S.W.3d 481, 482 (Tex. App.—Fort Worth
2015, no pet.) (mem. op.); see also Gray v. State, No. 02-17-00271-CR,
2017 WL 4296449, at *1 (Tex. App.—Fort Worth Sept. 28, 2017, no pet.) (mem. op.,
not designated for publication).
1 Steinetz has appointed counsel, but she filed her combined notice of appeal pro se.
2 /s/ Mike Wallach Mike Wallach Justice
Do Not Publish Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b)
Delivered: May 25, 2023
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Teanne Lynn Steinetz v. the State of Texas, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/teanne-lynn-steinetz-v-the-state-of-texas-texapp-2023.