Teamcare Infusion Inc. v. Comprehensive Health Management, Inc.

970 So. 2d 385, 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 17247, 2007 WL 3169169
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided October 31, 2007·No. 3D06-2223·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

970 So.2d 385 (2007)

TEAMCARE INFUSION INC., Appellant,
v.
COMPREHENSIVE HEALTH MANAGEMENT, INC., Appellee.

No. 3D06-2223.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

October 31, 2007.

Alan C. Gold, Miami, for appellant.

Shutts Bowen LLP and Gary M. Bagliebter and Sandra Upegui and Temple Fett Kearns, Fort Lauderdale, for appellee.

Before GERSTEN, C.J., and CORTIÑAS, J., and SCHWARTZ, Senior Judge.

PER CURIAM.

The award of sanctions under section 57.105, Florida Statutes (2006), is reversed with directions to deny the application because, as a matter of law, the facts and circumstances of the case do not demonstrate any of the statutory prerequisites for that relief. See Bowen v. Brewer, 936 So.2d 757 (Fla. 2d DCA 2006), review denied, 952 So.2d 1188 (Fla.2007); Connelly v. Old Bridge Vill. Co-Op, Inc., 915 So.2d 652 (Fla. 2d DCA 2005); Munoz v. City of Miami, 853 So.2d 489 (Fla. 3d DCA 2003); Read v. Taylor, 832 So.2d 219 (Fla. 4th DCA 2002). This holding pretermits the discussion of the several other, apparently meritorious, grounds asserted for reversal.

Reversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Teamcare Infusion Inc. v. Comprehensive Health Management, Inc., 970 So. 2d 385, 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 17247, 2007 WL 3169169 (Fla. Ct. App. 2007).

970 So. 2d 385 (Teamcare Infusion Inc. v. Comprehensive Health Management, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Hanna v. State
970 So. 2d 385 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2007)