Team Worldwide Corporation v. Intex Recreation Corp.
Opinion
Case: 22-1860 Document: 72 Page: 1 Filed: 10/11/2023
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
TEAM WORLDWIDE CORPORATION, Appellant
v.
INTEX RECREATION CORP., BESTWAY (USA), INC., Appellees
2022-1860
Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. IPR2018- 00859.
JUDGMENT
ROBERT M. HARKINS, JR., Cherian LLP, Berkeley, CA, argued for appellant. Also represented by JAMES MICHAEL WOODS, Washington, DC; TIMOTHY E. BIANCHI, Schwegman Lundberg & Woessner, PA, Minneapolis, MN.
ANDREW M. MCCOY, Faegre Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP, Indianapolis, IN, argued for all appellees. Appellee Intex Recreation Corp. also represented by R. TREVOR CARTER, REID E. DODGE.
Case: 22-1860 Document: 72 Page: 2 Filed: 10/11/2023
JOHN S. ARTZ, Dickinson Wright PLLC, Ann Arbor, MI, for appellee Bestway (USA), Inc. Also represented by STEVEN A. CALOIARO, Reno, NV.
THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is
ORDERED and ADJUDGED:
PER CURIAM (LOURIE, DYK, and TARANTO, Circuit Judges).
AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.
ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT
October 11, 2023 Date
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Team Worldwide Corporation v. Intex Recreation Corp. (Team Worldwide Corporation v. Intex Recreation Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.