Team 125, Inc. v. Eastern Airlines, LLC
Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 6 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 7 TEAM 125, INC., Case No. 2:21-cv-00520-KJD-NJK 9 Plaintiff(s), Order 10] v. [Docket No. 18] 11! EASTERN AIRLINES, LLC, 12 Defendant(s). 13 Pending before the Court is Defendant’s motion to stay discovery pending resolution of its 14] motion to dismiss. Docket No. 18; see also Docket No. 7 (motion to dismiss). Plaintiff did not 15]| file a response to that motion and the deadline for doing so has expired. See Local Rule 7-2(b).' Considering the governing standards, Kor Media Group, LLC v. Green, 294 F.R.D. 579, 581 (D. 17} Nev. 2013), the Court finds that a stay of discovery is appropriate in this case. 18 Accordingly, the motion to stay discovery is GRANTED. In the event resolution of the 19} motion to dismiss does not result in the ending of this case, a joint proposed discovery plan must 20] be filed within 14 days of the issuance of that order. 21 IT IS SO ORDERED. 22 Dated: September 20, 2021 Nancy J. Koppe □ 24 United States. Magistrate Judge 25 26) ———___ ' In a discovery plan, Plaintiff did state without elaboration that it “disagrees that the 27|| Motion to Dismiss is likely to dispose of the present case, and thus cannot provide the Court with a sufficient basis to stay discovery (though Plaintiff does not oppose the request, in the interests of 28] conserving judicial (and party) economy).” Docket No. 17 at 1-2.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Team 125, Inc. v. Eastern Airlines, LLC (Team 125, Inc. v. Eastern Airlines, LLC) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.