Teal v. State

571 So. 2d 1, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 2352
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedApril 10, 1990
DocketNos. 88-2667, 89-1768
StatusPublished

This text of 571 So. 2d 1 (Teal v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Teal v. State, 571 So. 2d 1, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 2352 (Fla. Ct. App. 1990).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, Kenneth Teal, appeals his conviction and sentence contending the trial court committed reversible error by rebuking his attorney in front of the jury. We affirm.

Our review of the record shows that the trial court endeavored to keep the trial on an even keel by limiting colloquy of respective counsel. Here, the trial judge’s comments were perfectly in line with the orderly administration of justice and maintaining the flow of this trial. We find no grounds [2]*2for reversal. See Wilkerson v. State, 510 So.2d 1253 (Fla. 1st DCA 1987); Baisden v. State, 203 So.2d 194 (Fla. 4th DCA 1967).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Baisden v. State
203 So. 2d 194 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1967)
Wilkerson v. State
510 So. 2d 1253 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1987)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
571 So. 2d 1, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 2352, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/teal-v-state-fladistctapp-1990.