Teal v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Teal v. State

571 So. 2d 1, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 2352

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided April 10, 1990·No. Nos. 88-2667, 89-1768·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, Kenneth Teal, appeals his conviction and sentence contending the trial court committed reversible error by rebuking his attorney in front of the jury. We affirm.

Our review of the record shows that the trial court endeavored to keep the trial on an even keel by limiting colloquy of respective counsel. Here, the trial judge’s comments were perfectly in line with the orderly administration of justice and maintaining the flow of this trial. We find no grounds [2]*2for reversal. See Wilkerson v. State, 510 So.2d 1253 (Fla. 1st DCA 1987); Baisden v. State, 203 So.2d 194 (Fla. 4th DCA 1967).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, Kenneth Teal, appeals his conviction and sentence contending the trial court committed reversible error by rebuking his attorney in front of the jury. We affirm.

Our review of the record shows that the trial court endeavored to keep the trial on an even keel by limiting colloquy of respective counsel. Here, the trial judge’s comments were perfectly in line with the orderly administration of justice and maintaining the flow of this trial. We find no grounds [2]*2for reversal. See Wilkerson v. State, 510 So.2d 1253 (Fla. 1st DCA 1987); Baisden v. State, 203 So.2d 194 (Fla. 4th DCA 1967).

Teal v. State, 571 So. 2d 1, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 2352 (Fla. Ct. App. 1990).

Pincite

571 So. 2d 1 (Teal v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related