Teal v. Equitable Loan Co.

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Teal v. Equitable Loan Co.

159 S.E. 904, 43 Ga. App. 673, 1931 Ga. App. LEXIS 505

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedJuly 14, 1931

Docket20991

StatusPublished

Cited by5 cases

This text of 159 S.E. 904 (Teal v. Equitable Loan Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Teal v. Equitable Loan Co., 159 S.E. 904, 43 Ga. App. 673, 1931 Ga. App. LEXIS 505 (Ga. Ct. App. 1931).

Pincite

Opinions

Broyles, 0. J.

1. The general demurrer and paragraphs 3 and 4 of the special demurrer to the petition were properly overruled.

2. Paragraph 2 of the special demurrer to the petition should have been sustained, but, under all the facts of the case, the error in overruling it was harmless and does not require a reversal of the judgment. .

3. The special assignments of error in the petition for certiorari are. without merit; the verdict was authorized by the evidence; and the overruling of the certiorari was not error.

Judgment affirmed,.

Luke, J., coneurs. Bloodicorth, J., absent on aeeount of illness. F. F. Goodrum, for plaintiff in error. Martin, Martin, Snow & Gillen, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI