Teal v. Equitable Loan Co.
159 S.E. 904, 43 Ga. App. 673, 1931 Ga. App. LEXIS 505
Opinions
1. The general demurrer and paragraphs 3 and 4 of the special demurrer to the petition were properly overruled.
2. Paragraph 2 of the special demurrer to the petition should have been sustained, but, under all the facts of the case, the error in overruling it was harmless and does not require a reversal of the judgment. .
3. The special assignments of error in the petition for certiorari are. without merit; the verdict was authorized by the evidence; and the overruling of the certiorari was not error.
Judgment affirmed,.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Teal v. Equitable Loan Co., 159 S.E. 904, 43 Ga. App. 673, 1931 Ga. App. LEXIS 505 (Ga. Ct. App. 1931).
159 S.E. 904 (Teal v. Equitable Loan Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
McLendon v. McLendon
96 Ga. App. 197 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1957)
Osley v. Abernathy
84 S.E.2d 113 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1954)
Frank Graham Co. v. Graham
84 S.E.2d 579 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1954)
Crews v. Roberson
10 S.E.2d 114 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1940)