Teague v. Meredith

458 F. App'x 256
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedDecember 19, 2011
DocketNo. 11-1866
StatusPublished

This text of 458 F. App'x 256 (Teague v. Meredith) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Teague v. Meredith, 458 F. App'x 256 (4th Cir. 2011).

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Donald B. Teague appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment to Defendant in Teague’s civil action. On appeal, we confine our review to the issues raised in the Appellant’s brief. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b). Because Teague’s informal brief does not challenge the basis for the district court’s disposition, Teague has forfeited appellate review of the court’s order. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s judgment. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
458 F. App'x 256, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/teague-v-meredith-ca4-2011.