Teague v. Meredith

Fourth Circuit

Teague v. Meredith

458 F. App'x 256

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided December 19, 2011·No. No. 11-1866·Published

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Donald B. Teague appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment to Defendant in Teague’s civil action. On appeal, we confine our review to the issues raised in the Appellant’s brief. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b). Because Teague’s informal brief does not challenge the basis for the district court’s disposition, Teague has forfeited appellate review of the court’s order. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s judgment. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Donald B. Teague appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment to Defendant in Teague’s civil action. On appeal, we confine our review to the issues raised in the Appellant’s brief. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b). Because Teague’s informal brief does not challenge the basis for the district court’s disposition, Teague has forfeited appellate review of the court’s order. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s judgment. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Teague v. Meredith, 458 F. App'x 256 (4th Cir. 2011).

Pincite

458 F. App'x 256 (Teague v. Meredith) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.