T.D.F. v. State

813 So. 2d 302, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 5246, 2002 WL 662812
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided April 24, 2002·No. No. 3D01-218·Published

Opinion

CONFESSION OF ERROR

PER CURIAM.

In accordance with the state’s confession of error and our own review of the record, the order of restitution below is vacated because it was unauthorizedly entered more than sixty days after sentencing. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.800(c); State v. M.C., 666 So.2d 877 (Fla.1995).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

T.D.F. v. State, 813 So. 2d 302, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 5246, 2002 WL 662812 (Fla. Ct. App. 2002).

813 So. 2d 302 (T.D.F. v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. M.C.
666 So. 2d 877 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1995)