T.D.F. v. State
813 So. 2d 302, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 5246, 2002 WL 662812
This text of 813 So. 2d 302 (T.D.F. v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
T.D.F. v. State, 813 So. 2d 302, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 5246, 2002 WL 662812 (Fla. Ct. App. 2002).
Opinion
CONFESSION OF ERROR
In accordance with the state’s confession of error and our own review of the record, the order of restitution below is vacated because it was unauthorizedly entered more than sixty days after sentencing. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.800(c); State v. M.C., 666 So.2d 877 (Fla.1995).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
State v. M.C.
666 So. 2d 877 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1995)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
813 So. 2d 302, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 5246, 2002 WL 662812, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tdf-v-state-fladistctapp-2002.