T.D. v. R.G., on behalf of N.G., a minor child (Appeal from Madison Circuit Court: DR-23-3039).

• Court: Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama
• Decided: January 19, 2024
• Docket: CL-2023-0221
• Status: Published

Opinion

Rel: January 19, 2024

Notice: This opinion is subject to formal revision before publication in the advance sheets of Southern Reporter. Readers are requested to notify the Reporter of Decisions, Alabama Appellate Courts, 300 Dexter Avenue, Montgomery, Alabama 36104-3741 ((334) 229-0650), of any typographical or other errors, in order that corrections may be made before the opinion is published in Southern Reporter.

ALABAMA COURT OF CIVIL APPEALS OCTOBER TERM, 2023-2024 _________________________

CL-2023-0221 _________________________

T.D.

v.

R.G., on behalf of N.G., a minor child

Appeal from Madison Circuit Court (DR-23-3039)

FRIDY, Judge.

T.D. appeals from a final protection-from-abuse judgment entered

by the Circuit Court of Madison County ("the trial court") pursuant to the

Protection From Abuse Act, § 30-5-1 et seq., Ala. Code 1975 ("the Act").

We reverse and remand. CL-2023-0221

Background

In January 2023, T.D., who was then eighteen years old, and N.G.,

who was then seventeen years old, were dating. In early January 2023,

N.G.'s father R.G. and N.G.'s stepmother took N.G. and her younger

sister to the Walt Disney World Resort ("Disney World"). R.G. testified

that, after they left for Disney World, he overheard T.D. telling N.G. on

her cellular telephone that she and her family were "lame" for leaving on

vacation without telling him what time they were leaving. R.G. testified

that he had not told N.G. what time they were going to leave because:

"As a father, I don't have to give anybody a time to leave. I'm going to

leave when I'm ready to leave." According to R.G., T.D. continued to call

N.G. while she and her family were at Disney World, and, on at least one

occasion, N.G. and T.D. fell asleep during a video conferencing call in

with each other at 3:00 or 4:00 in the morning. R.G. said that he read a

text message on N.G.'s telephone in which T.D. said that he wanted to

commit suicide because N.G. could not be on the telephone with him

twenty-four hours a day.

R.G. testified that, when he and his family returned from Disney

World, he told N.G. that she needed to take a break from her relationship

2 CL-2023-0221

with T.D. R.G. testified that he would not allow N.G. to go to T.D.'s house

for three or four days after their return from Disney World. R.G. said

that, at approximately 10:00 a.m. on the Friday after the family's return

from Disney World, N.G. asked him if she could go with T.D. to a

basketball game and homecoming ceremony in Clarksville, Tennessee,

where N.G.'s biological mother and maternal grandmother live. R.G. said

that he had told N.G. that she could not go with T.D. to Clarksville and

that she had to stay at home. R.G. testified that, when he returned home

at approximately 4:00 p.m. that day, he found that N.G. had left their

house without her cellular telephone and automobile keys and that she

had left notes addressed to R.G., N.G.'s stepmother, and N.G.'s younger

sister in which N.G. informed them that she was running away from

home. R.G. testified that he checked the family's security cameras and

saw that, at approximately 1:05 p.m. that day, N.G. had gotten into T.D.'s

mother's automobile. R.G. testified that, in the note N.G. had left for him,

N.G. stated that she had almost tried to kill herself a few days earlier.

According to R.G., he then called N.G.'s stepmother and told her what

had happened. He said that N.G.'s stepmother subsequently called T.D.'s

mother and that T.D.'s mother told N.G.'s stepmother that N.G. was safe

3 CL-2023-0221

and that there was nothing they needed to worry about. R.G. testified

that he searched for N.G. night and day but that he did not learn of her

whereabouts until approximately February 8, 2023, when N.G.'s

biological mother called him and told him that N.G. was at her house in

Clarksville. R.G. said that, during the time that he did not know where

N.G. was, he had received messages from people telling him that N.G.

was staying with various relatives of T.D.; however, he testified that the

police had searched T.D.'s parents' house, where T.D. lives, several times

and had searched the houses of relatives of T.D. but that the police did

not find N.G. at any of those houses. R.G. admitted that he did not have

any evidence indicating that T.D. himself was transporting N.G. to

different residences while she was missing. R.G. testified that he requires

N.G. to ask his permission before she goes anywhere and that she did not

want to live in his house any longer because she did not want to follow

his rules.

R.G. testified that, on January 23, 2023, before he learned that N.G.

was at her biological mother's residence in Clarksville, he, acting in his

capacity as a parent of N.G., had petitioned the trial court to enter a

protection-from-abuse order against T.D. In his petition, R.G. alleged

4 CL-2023-0221

that T.D. had trespassed on R.G.'s property, that T.D. had recklessly

engaged in conduct that put N.G. at risk of suffering serious injury, and

that T.D. had exposed N.G. to drugs. R.G. also alleged that, throughout

T.D.'s dating relationship with N.G., he had continuously subjected N.G.

to verbal and physical abuse; that T.D. had threatened to commit suicide;

that N.G. had also threatened to commit suicide; that T.D. had a gun;

that T.D. was unstable and had a criminal record; that T.D. had been

expelled from school; and that the local community feared T.D.'s family.

The trial court entered an ex parte protection-from-abuse order on

January 23, 2023. Later that same day, a Madison County deputy sheriff

personally served T.D. with process at his parents' residence. The trial

court initially set the matter for a final hearing on February 8, 2023;

however, on February 8, 2023, it continued the final hearing until

February 23, 2023, because N.G. had not yet returned to Madison County

from her biological mother's residence in Clarksville.

N.G. testified that she wanted to talk to T.D. while she and her

family were on vacation at Disney World, that her father had prohibited

her from talking to T.D. while they were on vacation, and that she had

called T.D. at night to circumvent her father's prohibition of such calls.

5 CL-2023-0221

N.G. testified that, on the day she ran away from home, she had called

T.D.'s mother and asked her to come pick her up. N.G. testified that T.D.'s

mother did not know that N.G. was running away from home when T.D.'s

mother picked her up. N.G. said that T.D.'s mother thought that N.G.

just wanted to come over to their house to wait for T.D. to get off work

and take her to Clarksville for the homecoming. N.G. testified that she

wanted to run away from her father's house because she considered the

situation at her father's house "very toxic" because there was "arguing all

the time." N.G. said that she cannot go anywhere without asking her

father for permission, even if she just wants to go to the store or to go see

her friends. She said that she did not think her father should be so strict.

She testified that she contemplated cutting herself because she felt numb

and wanted to feel something. She said that she is now in counseling and

that the counseling has helped her.

N.G. testified that T.D. had not kidnapped her and that running

away from home was solely her idea. She testified that, after she had run

away from her father's house, she had decided that she wanted to go to

her biological mother's house and that a man she did not know had driven

her to Clarksville and dropped her off at her maternal grandmother's

6 CL-2023-0221

house. She said that she then called her biological mother who came and

picked her up at her maternal grandmother's house. N.G. testified that,

on the morning of the day she ran away, she had asked her father if she

could go to Clarksville because her cousin was in the homecoming court

at the high school there and N.G. wanted to see her cousin in the

homecoming ceremony. She said that she also wanted to see her

biological mother in Clarksville. N.G. testified that R.G. had refused to

let her go to Clarksville with T.D.

N.G. testified that T.D. had never abused her. She admitted that

she and T.D. had sometimes had minor arguments but that the

arguments were never serious and that T.D. had never put his hands on

her.

T.D.'s mother testified that, when she picked up N.G., she thought

that N.G. just wanted to come over to T.D.'s parents' house to wait for

T.D. to get off work and take N.G. to Clarksville. T.D.'s mother said that

N.G. had waited at their house until T.D. got home from work about 3:30

p.m. and that T.D. and N.G. had then left. T.D.'s mother testified that,

when T.D. and N.G. left that afternoon, she thought they were going to

Clarksville.

7 CL-2023-0221

T.D.'s mother testified that T.D. and N.G. had been dating for three

years and that N.G. had come over to their house frequently in the past.

T.D.'s mother testified that she did not learn that N.G. had run away

from home until later that night when N.G.'s stepmother called her and

she later saw on social media that people were saying that T.D.'s mother

had kidnapped N.G. T.D.'s mother testified that she had not kidnapped

N.G. T.D.'s mother testified that, after T.D. and N.G. left her house that

Friday afternoon, N.G. had not been at her house during the time that

R.G. did not know where N.G. was. She testified that she did not know

where N.G. had been during that period. T.D.'s mother testified that

Madison County deputy sheriffs had searched her house eight or nine

times during the period when R.G. did not know where N.G. was and that

they did not find her there. T.D.'s mother testified that she and her

husband had cooperated with the Madison County deputy sheriffs. T.D.'s

mother testified that she had not asked T.D. where N.G. was after

learning that N.G. had run away.

On February 24, 2023, the trial court entered a final judgment

expressly finding that T.D. had committed an act of domestic violence

against N.G., making the ex parte protection-from-abuse order a final

8 CL-2023-0221

judgment, and providing that the protection-from-abuse order would

remain in effect for three years. T.D. then timely appealed to this court.

Standard of Review

When a trial court hears ore tenus testimony, its factual findings

on disputed evidence are presumed correct and its judgment based on

those findings will not be reversed unless the judgment is palpably

erroneous or manifestly unjust. See Fadalla v. Fadalla, 929 So. 2d 429,

433 (Ala. 2005). However, that presumption of correctness is rebuttable

and may be overcome where there is insufficient evidence presented to

the trial court to sustain its judgment. Id. Moreover, the ore tenus rule

does not cloak a trial court's conclusions of law or its application of the

law to the facts with a presumption of correctness. Id.

Analysis

On appeal, T.D. argues that the trial court erred in entering a final

protection-from-abuse judgment against him because, he says, R.G.

failed to prove that he had committed an act of abuse as that term is

defined by the Act. Section 30-5-2(1), Ala. Code 1975, defines "abuse" as:

"An act committed against a victim, which is any of the following:

9 CL-2023-0221

"a. Arson. Arson as defined under Sections 13A-7-40 to 13A-7-43, [Ala. Code 1975,] inclusive.

"b. Assault. Assault as defined under Sections 13A-6-20 to 13A-6-22, [Ala. Code 1975,] inclusive.

"c. Attempt. Attempt as defined under Section 13A-4-2[, Ala. Code 1975].

"d. Child Abuse. Torture or willful abuse of a child, aggravated child abuse, or chemical endangerment of a child as provided in Chapter 15, commencing with Section 26-15-1, of Title 26, [Ala. Code 1975,] known as the Alabama Child Abuse Act.

"e. Criminal Coercion. Criminal coercion as defined under Section 13A-6-25[, Ala. Code 1975].

"f. Criminal Trespass. Criminal trespass as defined under Sections 13A-7-2 to 13A-7-4.1, [Ala. Code 1975,] inclusive.

"g. Harassment. Harassment as defined under Section 13A-11-8[, Ala. Code 1975].

"h. Kidnapping. Kidnapping as defined under Sections 13A-6-43 and 13A-6-44[, Ala. Code 1975].

"i. Menacing. Menacing as defined under Section 13A-6- 23[, Ala. Code 1975].

"j. Other Conduct. Any other conduct directed toward a plaintiff covered by this chapter that could be punished as a criminal act under the laws of this state.

"k. Reckless Endangerment. Reckless endangerment as defined under Section 13A-6-24[, Ala. Code 1975].

10 CL-2023-0221

"l. Sexual Abuse. Any sexual offenses included in Article 4, commencing with Section 13A-6-60, of Chapter 6 of Title 13A[, Ala. Code 1975].

"m. Stalking. Stalking as defined under Sections 13A-6- 90 to 13A-6-94, [Ala. Code 1975,] inclusive.

"n. Theft. Theft as defined under Sections 13A-8-1 to 13A-8-5, [Ala. Code 1975,] inclusive.

"o. Unlawful Imprisonment. Unlawful imprisonment as defined under Sections 13A-6-41 and 13A-6-42[, Ala. Code 1975]."

The only forms of abuse that could possibly apply to the facts of this

case are kidnapping and unlawful imprisonment. To prove either first-

degree or second-degree kidnapping, a complainant must prove that the

defendant "abducted" the victim. See §§ 13A-6-43 and 13A-6-44, Ala.

Code 1975; and Grayson v. State, 824 So. 2d 804, 816 (Ala. Crim. App.

1999). To prove that the defendant abducted someone, the complainant

must prove that the defendant "restrained" the victim. See § 13A-6-40(2),

Ala. Code 1975; Grayson, 824 So. 2d at 816. To prove that the defendant

"restrained" the victim, the complainant must prove that the defendant

restricted the victim's movements "without consent." See § 13A-6-40(1),

Ala. Code 1975; Grayson, 824 at 816. The undisputed evidence in this

case indicated that N.G. consensually ran away from R.G.'s home and

11 CL-2023-0221

consensually remained away from R.G.'s home until February 8, 2023,

without any "restraint" by T.D. Therefore, the evidence did not establish

that T.D. kidnapped N.G.

To prove that a defendant unlawfully imprisoned a victim, a

complainant must prove that the defendant "restrained" the victim. See

§§ 13A-6-41 and 13A-6-42, Ala. Code 1975. To prove that the defendant

"restrained" the victim, the complainant must prove that the defendant

restricted the victim's movement without the victim's consent. See § 13A-

6-40(1). In the present case, the record does not contain any evidence

indicating that T.D. restricted N.G.'s movement without her consent.

Therefore, the evidence did not establish that T.D. unlawfully imprisoned

N.G.

Because the evidence did not establish that T.D. committed an act

of abuse against N.G., the trial court erred in entering a final protection-

from-abuse judgment against T.D. Therefore, we reverse the judgment of

the trial court and remand the cause for further proceedings consistent

with this opinion.

REVERSED AND REMANDED.

Thompson, P.J., and Moore, Edwards, and Hanson, JJ., concur.