T.D. Holding Corp. v. Hanley

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

T.D. Holding Corp. v. Hanley

235 A.D.2d 325, 652 N.Y.S.2d 957, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 508

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJanuary 23, 1997

StatusPublished

This text of 235 A.D.2d 325 (T.D. Holding Corp. v. Hanley) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

T.D. Holding Corp. v. Hanley, 235 A.D.2d 325, 652 N.Y.S.2d 957, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 508 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1997).

Pincite

Opinion

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Stuart Cohen, J.), entered October 24, 1995, granting defendant interest, attorneys’ fees and costs in the amount of $220,802.64, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The note clearly and unambiguously obliged plaintiffs to pay the legal fees and costs incurred in its enforcement and collection. The award, including the disallowance of additional fees, was based upon the trial court’s review of the evidence and was a sound exercise of discretion (see, Hovanec Bldrs. & Developers Corp. v Hines, 173 AD2d 951).

We have considered the parties’ remaining arguments for affirmative relief and find them to be without merit. Concur— Williams, J. P., Tom, Mazzarelli and Andrias, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Stuart Cohen, J.), entered October 24, 1995, granting defendant interest, attorneys’ fees and costs in the amount of $220,802.64, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The note clearly and unambiguously obliged plaintiffs to pay the legal fees and costs incurred in its enforcement and collection. The award, including the disallowance of additional fees, was based upon the trial court’s review of the evidence and was a sound exercise of discretion (see, Hovanec Bldrs. & Developers Corp. v Hines, 173 AD2d 951).

We have considered the parties’ remaining arguments for affirmative relief and find them to be without merit. Concur— Williams, J. P., Tom, Mazzarelli and Andrias, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

235 A.D.2d 325, 652 N.Y.S.2d 957, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 508, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/td-holding-corp-v-hanley-nyappdiv-1997.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack