TD Bank, N.A. v. Roberts

2020 NY Slip Op 05073
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided September 23, 2020·No. Index No. 135230/14·Published

Opinion

TD Bank, N.A. v Roberts (2020 NY Slip Op 05073)
TD Bank, N.A. v Roberts
2020 NY Slip Op 05073
Decided on September 23, 2020
Appellate Division, Second Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.


Decided on September 23, 2020 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department
WILLIAM F. MASTRO, J.P.
JEFFREY A. COHEN
LINDA CHRISTOPHER
PAUL WOOTEN, JJ.

2017-06764
2017-06766
(Index No. 135230/14)

[*1]TD Bank, N.A., etc., respondent,

v

Charmaine Roberts, etc., et al., defendants, Wade Cockburn, etc., appellant.


Wade Cockburn, Staten Island, NY, appellant pro se.

McCalla Raymer Leibert Pierce, LLC, New York, NY (Brian P. Scibetta of counsel), for respondent.



DECISION & ORDER

In an action to foreclose a mortgage, the defendant Wade Cockburn appeals from (1) an order of the Supreme Court, Richmond County (Judith N. McMahon, J.), dated April 21, 2017, and (2) an order of the same court dated June 6, 2017. The order dated April 21, 2017, insofar as appealed from, granted those branches of the plaintiff's motion which were for summary judgment on the complaint insofar as asserted against that defendant, to strike that defendant's answer, and for an order of reference. The order dated June 6, 2017, insofar as appealed from, denied that defendant's cross motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against him.

ORDERED that the appeals are dismissed, without costs or disbursements.

The appeals from the orders dated April 21, 2017, and June 6, 2017, must be dismissed because the right of direct appeal therefrom terminated with the entry of the order and judgment of foreclosure and sale in the action (see Matter of Aho, 39 NY2d 241, 248). The issues raised on the appeals from the orders are brought up for review and have been considered on the appeal from the order and judgment of foreclosure and sale (see CPLR 5501[a][1]; TD Bank, N.A. v Roberts, _____ AD3d _____ [Appellate Division Docket No. 2018-12571; decided herewith]).

MASTRO, J.P., COHEN, CHRISTOPHER and WOOTEN, JJ., concur.

ENTER:

Aprilanne Agostino

Clerk of the Court



Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

TD Bank, N.A. v. Roberts, 2020 NY Slip Op 05073 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2020).

2020 NY Slip Op 05073 (TD Bank, N.A. v. Roberts) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In re Aho
347 N.E.2d 647 (New York Court of Appeals, 1976)