TD Bank, N.A. v. Ituah, A.
This text of TD Bank, N.A. v. Ituah, A. (TD Bank, N.A. v. Ituah, A.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA EASTERN DISTRICT
ABRAHAM ITUAH, INDIVIDUALLY, AND : No. 111 EM 2015 D/B/A OSAZE & SONS ENTERPRISE : : : v. : : : TD BANK, N.A., SUCCESSOR TO : COMMERCE BANK/PENNSYLVANIA, : N.A., 2005 MARKET STREET, : PHILADELPHIA, PA 19103 :
ORDER
PER CURIAM
AND NOW, this 3rd day of November, 2015, the Petition for Leave to File
Petition for Allowance of Appeal Nunc Pro Tunc is DENIED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
TD Bank, N.A. v. Ituah, A., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/td-bank-na-v-ituah-a-pa-2015.