T.D. Bank, N.A. v. Halcyon Jets, Inc.

99 A.D.3d 431, 951 N.Y.2d 724
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedOctober 4, 2012
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 99 A.D.3d 431 (T.D. Bank, N.A. v. Halcyon Jets, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
T.D. Bank, N.A. v. Halcyon Jets, Inc., 99 A.D.3d 431, 951 N.Y.2d 724 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2012).

Opinion

Plaintiff bank seeks to hold defendant Drykerman, who opened a line of credit in his capacity as an employee of the defaulting defendant, Halcyon Jets, Inc., personally liable for the corporation’s debt. It is well settled that officers or agents of a corporation are not personally liable on corporate contracts if they do not purport to bind themselves individually (Savoy Record Co. v Cardinal Export Corp., 15 NY2d 1 [1964]). Here, plaintiff failed to produce the credit card agreement allegedly signed by Drykerman or any documents estabhshing that he assumed corporate liability (see General Obligations Law § 5-701 [432]*432[a] [2]). Accordingly, summary judgment dismissing the complaint as against Drykerman was properly granted.

We have considered plaintiffs additional arguments and find them unavailing. Concur — Gonzalez, P.J., Saxe, DeGrasse, Freedman and Román, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Kasowitz, Benson, Torres & Friedman, LLP v. Cao
105 A.D.3d 521 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2013)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
99 A.D.3d 431, 951 N.Y.2d 724, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/td-bank-na-v-halcyon-jets-inc-nyappdiv-2012.