Tcholakian v. Tcholakian

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Tcholakian v. Tcholakian

29 A.D.2d 848, 287 N.Y.S.2d 920, 1968 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4493

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided March 5, 1968·Published

Opinion

Orders of Family Court, respectively entered April 28, 1967, July 24, 1967, September 13, 1967 and September 20, 1967, unanimously affirmed, with $50 costs and disbursements to petitioner-respondent. The incidental determination by the Family Court that the Mexean divorce decree is invalid is not res judicata in the action pending between the parties in the Supreme Court (Loomis v. Loomis, 288 N. Y. 222), and the instant disposition is without prejudice to the maintenance of that action. Concur — Botein, P. J., Steuer, Capozzoli, MeGivern and McNally, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Orders of Family Court, respectively entered April 28, 1967, July 24, 1967, September 13, 1967 and September 20, 1967, unanimously affirmed, with $50 costs and disbursements to petitioner-respondent. The incidental determination by the Family Court that the Mexean divorce decree is invalid is not res judicata in the action pending between the parties in the Supreme Court (Loomis v. Loomis, 288 N. Y. 222), and the instant disposition is without prejudice to the maintenance of that action. Concur — Botein, P. J., Steuer, Capozzoli, MeGivern and McNally, JJ.

Tcholakian v. Tcholakian, 29 A.D.2d 848, 287 N.Y.S.2d 920, 1968 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4493 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1968).

Pincite

29 A.D.2d 848 (Tcholakian v. Tcholakian) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related