Tcholakian v. Tcholakian

29 A.D.2d 848, 287 N.Y.S.2d 920, 1968 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4493

This text of 29 A.D.2d 848 (Tcholakian v. Tcholakian) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Tcholakian v. Tcholakian, 29 A.D.2d 848, 287 N.Y.S.2d 920, 1968 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4493 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1968).

Opinion

Orders of Family Court, respectively entered April 28, 1967, July 24, 1967, September 13, 1967 and September 20, 1967, unanimously affirmed, with $50 costs and disbursements to petitioner-respondent. The incidental determination by the Family Court that the Mexean divorce decree is invalid is not res judicata in the action pending between the parties in the Supreme Court (Loomis v. Loomis, 288 N. Y. 222), and the instant disposition is without prejudice to the maintenance of that action. Concur — Botein, P. J., Steuer, Capozzoli, MeGivern and McNally, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Loomis v. Loomis
42 N.E.2d 495 (New York Court of Appeals, 1942)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
29 A.D.2d 848, 287 N.Y.S.2d 920, 1968 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4493, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tcholakian-v-tcholakian-nyappdiv-1968.