Tchlenoff v. Huntervan Realty Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Tchlenoff v. Huntervan Realty Corp.

267 A.D. 884, 46 N.Y.S.2d 456, 1944 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5303

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided February 21, 1944·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

On appeal by plaintiff Michel Tchlenoff, the order dismissing a judgment creditor’s action as to defendants Universal Machine Tool Manufacturing Company, Inc., and Huntervan Realty Corporation, is affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. No opinion. The appeal of Borris M. Komar from the above-described order- is dismissed, without costs, as he is not a person aggrieved within the purview'of section 557 of the Civil Practice Act. Carswell, .Acting P. J., Johnston, Adel, Lewis and Aldrich, JJ., concur. [See post, p. 957.]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

On appeal by plaintiff Michel Tchlenoff, the order dismissing a judgment creditor’s action as to defendants Universal Machine Tool Manufacturing Company, Inc., and Huntervan Realty Corporation, is affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. No opinion. The appeal of Borris M. Komar from the above-described order- is dismissed, without costs, as he is not a person aggrieved within the purview'of section 557 of the Civil Practice Act. Carswell, .Acting P. J., Johnston, Adel, Lewis and Aldrich, JJ., concur. [See post, p. 957.]

Tchlenoff v. Huntervan Realty Corp., 267 A.D. 884, 46 N.Y.S.2d 456, 1944 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5303 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1944).

Pincite

267 A.D. 884 (Tchlenoff v. Huntervan Realty Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related