Tchenguiz v. Bird

District Court, D. Montana·Decided January 3, 2022·No. 9:21-cv-00128·Unknown

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MONTANA MISSOULA DIVISION

ROBERT TCHENGUIZ, CV 21-128-M-DWM Petitioner, VS. ORDER HEATHER BIRD, Defendant.

Stephen Komie, of the law firm of Komie and Associates, moves for pro hac vice admission on behalf of the V.A.B.T, the minor child at issue in this case. (Doc. 65.) Petitioner Robert Tchenguiz opposes the motion. (Doc. 66.) As Tchenguiz notes, Komie cites no authority in support of his motion to appear pro hac vice, nor does Komie make any arguments as to why V.A.B.T., who is not a party to these proceedings, requires representation. In Hague Convention cases, a district court may appoint counsel for children who are the subject of proceedings under the Convention. See Kufner v. Kufner, 519 F.3d 33, 37 (1st Cir. 2008). However, such appointments are generally made “with the consent of the parties” and the appointment is made by the district court not—as is apparently the case here—at the suggestion of only one of the parties. See id. Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED that Komie’s motion for pro hac vice admission, (Doc. 65), is DENIED. DATED this ard, of January, 2022.

iM A olloy, District Judge United States District Court

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Tchenguiz v. Bird, (D. Mont. 2022).

Tchenguiz v. Bird (Tchenguiz v. Bird) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Kufner v. Kufner
519 F.3d 33 (First Circuit, 2008)