T.C. & C. Real Estate Holdings, Inc. v. Danny R. Sherrod and Wife, Wendy Sherrod

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedMay 31, 2006
Docket10-05-00124-CV
StatusPublished

This text of T.C. & C. Real Estate Holdings, Inc. v. Danny R. Sherrod and Wife, Wendy Sherrod (T.C. & C. Real Estate Holdings, Inc. v. Danny R. Sherrod and Wife, Wendy Sherrod) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
T.C. & C. Real Estate Holdings, Inc. v. Danny R. Sherrod and Wife, Wendy Sherrod, (Tex. Ct. App. 2006).

Opinion

IN THE

TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

 

No. 10-05-00124-CV

T.C. & C. Real Estate Holdings, Inc.,

                                                                      Appellant

 v.

Danny R. Sherrod and Wife,

Wendy Sherrod,

                                                                      Appellees


From the 77th District Court

Limestone County, Texas

Trial Court No. 27,034-A

BRIEFING ORDER


          The parties are notified that the Court questions its jurisdiction because the plaintiff amended its original petition, adding another cause of action, after the defendants filed their motion for summary judgment.

          The parties are ordered to brief the question whether the trial court’s judgment is a final, appealable order.  See Lehmann v. Har-Con Corp., 39 S.W.3d 191 (Tex. 2001).  Appellant’s  brief  is  due  within  21 days from the date of this Order.   Appellees’ brief is due


 within 21 days from the date Appellant files its brief.

                                                                   PER CURIAM

Before Chief Justice Gray,

          Justice Vance, and

          Justice Reyna

Order issued and filed May 31, 2006

Do not publish

sons for a severance are to do justice, avoid prejudice and further convenience.  St. Paul Ins. Co. v. McPeak, 641 S.W.2d 284 (Tex.App.--Houston [1st Dist] 1982, writ ref'd n.r.e.).

Guaranty Federal Sav. Bank v. Horseshoe Operating Co., 793 S.W.2d 652, 658 (Tex. 1990)

Conclusion

          For these reasons. I dissent from the severance and reinstatement order.

                                                                   TOM GRAY

                                                                   Chief Justice

Dissenting opinion delivered and filed May 25, 2005

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Lehmann v. Har-Con Corp.
39 S.W.3d 191 (Texas Supreme Court, 2001)
Guaranty Federal Savings Bank v. Horseshoe Operating Co.
793 S.W.2d 652 (Texas Supreme Court, 1990)
St. Paul Insurance Co. v. McPeak
641 S.W.2d 284 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1982)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
T.C. & C. Real Estate Holdings, Inc. v. Danny R. Sherrod and Wife, Wendy Sherrod, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tc-c-real-estate-holdings-inc-v-danny-r-sherrod-an-texapp-2006.