Tazzman, Inc. D/B/A Hardbody's of Arlington v. City of Arlington, Texas and Theron Bowman, Chief of Police

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided August 5, 2010·No. 02-10-00238-CV·Published

Opinion

COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 2-10-238-CV

TAZZMAN, INC. D/B/A                                                                       APPELLANT

HARDBODY'S OF ARLINGTON

                                                             V.

CITY OF ARLINGTON, TEXAS                                                           APPELLEES

AND THERON BOWMAN,

CHIEF OF POLICE

----------

FROM THE 96TH DISTRICT COURT OF TARRANT COUNTY

MEMORANDUM OPINION[1] AND JUDGMENT

We have considered “Appellant’s Motion To Dismiss Appeal.@  It is the court=s opinion that the motion should be granted; therefore, we dismiss the appeal.  See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(a)(1), 43.2(f).

Costs of the appeal shall be paid by appellant, for which let execution issue.  See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(d).

PER CURIAM

PANEL:  MCCOY, J.; LIVINGSTON, C.J.; and MEIER, J.   

DELIVERED:  August 5, 2010 



[1]See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Tazzman, Inc. D/B/A Hardbody's of Arlington v. City of Arlington, Texas and Theron Bowman, Chief of Police, (Tex. Ct. App. 2010).

Tazzman, Inc. D/B/A Hardbody's of Arlington v. City of Arlington, Texas and Theron Bowman, Chief of Police (Tazzman, Inc. D/B/A Hardbody's of Arlington v. City of Arlington, Texas and Theron Bowman, Chief of Police) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.