Tayn v. Kidde
This text of 28 F. App'x 337 (Tayn v. Kidde) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Wealegbay J.G. Tayn, Sr., appeals from the district court’s judgment granting summary judgment to Walter Kidde and dismissing his employment discrimination complaint. Tayn claims he was discriminated against and faced a hostile work environment because of his race, national origin, and age. He further claims his discharge from employment was retaliatory. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s memorandum opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Tayn v. Kidde, No. CA-00-749-1 (M.D.N.C. Oct. 30, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the *338 facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
28 F. App'x 337, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tayn-v-kidde-ca4-2002.