Taylor's Administratrix v. Peyton's Administratrix

Court of Appeals of Virginia

Taylor's Administratrix v. Peyton's Administratrix

1 Va. 252

DecidedApril 15, 1794

StatusPublished

This text of 1 Va. 252 (Taylor's Administratrix v. Peyton's Administratrix) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Virginia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Taylor's Administratrix v. Peyton's Administratrix, 1 Va. 252 (Va. Ct. App. 1794).

Pincite

Opinion

Lyons J.

We will not now determine how the case would have been if the defendant had insisted upon oyer of the original bond : because it is clear, that she has waved the necessity of its being produced, by accepting oyer of a copy, and pleading to the action.

The case is completely within the reason of the modern practice, stated in the case of Read v. Brookman, and the notes subjoined.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Lyons J.

We will not now determine how the case would have been if the defendant had insisted upon oyer of the original bond : because it is clear, that she has waved the necessity of its being produced, by accepting oyer of a copy, and pleading to the action.

The case is completely within the reason of the modern practice, stated in the case of Read v. Brookman, and the notes subjoined.

Judgment affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1 Va. 252, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/taylors-administratrix-v-peytons-administratrix-vactapp-1794.