Taylor Vs. State, Dep'T Of Corr.

Nevada Supreme Court·Decided August 7, 2020·No. 81495·Published

Opinion

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

DANNY TAYLOR, No. 81495 Appellant,

vs.

THE STATE OF NEVADA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS; FILED SERGEANT GENTRY; OFFICER AUG 0 7 2020 :

AARON HARROUN; RICHARD WEIRSMA; AND ROBERT LEGRAND, BUZABEM A. BROWN MEMO, SpPREME COURT

WARDEN, BY Cu-' IERK

1

Res s ondents.

ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL

This is a pro se appeal from an order denying appellant's motion for the appointment of counsel. Eleventh Judicial District Court, Pershing County; Jim C. Shirley, Judge.

The judgment or order designated in the notice of appeal is not substantively appealable. See NRAP 3A(b). This court has jurisdiction to consider an appeal only when the appeal is authorized by statute or court rule. Taylor Constr. Co. u. Hilton Hotels, 100 Nev. 207, 678 P.2d 1152 (1984). No statute or court rule provides for an appeal from an order denying a motion for the appointment of counsel. This court ORDERS this appeal DISMISSED.

Stiglich Silver

do -02 I,co

cc: Hon. Jim C. Shirley, District Judge Danny Taylor Attorney General/Carson City Pershing County Clerk

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA

f011 1947A AMOD 2

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Taylor Vs. State, Dep'T Of Corr., (Neb. 2020).

Taylor Vs. State, Dep'T Of Corr. (Taylor Vs. State, Dep'T Of Corr.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

TAYLOR CONSTRUCTION CO. v. Hilton Hotels Corp.
678 P.2d 1152 (Nevada Supreme Court, 1984)