Taylor Vs. State, Dep'T Of Corr.
This text of Taylor Vs. State, Dep'T Of Corr. (Taylor Vs. State, Dep'T Of Corr.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Nevada Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
DANNY TAYLOR, No. 81495 Appellant, vs. THE STATE OF NEVADA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS; FILED SERGEANT GENTRY; OFFICER AUG 0 7 2020 : AARON HARROUN; RICHARD WEIRSMA; AND ROBERT LEGRAND, BUZABEM A. BROWN MEMO, SpPREME COURT WARDEN, BY Cu-' IERK 1 Res s ondents.
ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL
This is a pro se appeal from an order denying appellant's motion for the appointment of counsel. Eleventh Judicial District Court, Pershing County; Jim C. Shirley, Judge. The judgment or order designated in the notice of appeal is not substantively appealable. See NRAP 3A(b). This court has jurisdiction to consider an appeal only when the appeal is authorized by statute or court rule. Taylor Constr. Co. u. Hilton Hotels, 100 Nev. 207, 678 P.2d 1152 (1984). No statute or court rule provides for an appeal from an order denying a motion for the appointment of counsel. This court ORDERS this appeal DISMISSED.
Stiglich Silver
do -02 I,co cc: Hon. Jim C. Shirley, District Judge Danny Taylor Attorney General/Carson City Pershing County Clerk
SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA
f011 1947A AMOD 2
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Taylor Vs. State, Dep'T Of Corr., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/taylor-vs-state-dept-of-corr-nev-2020.