Taylor v. Wood's Executors

Superior Court of North Carolina

Taylor v. Wood's Executors

3 N.C. 332

DecidedNovember 15, 1804

StatusPublished

This text of 3 N.C. 332 (Taylor v. Wood's Executors) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Superior Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Taylor v. Wood's Executors, 3 N.C. 332 (N.C. Ct. App. 1804).

Pincite

Opinion

‘XKToo-d had obtained a judgment against Taylor as a collector, * ’ without giving him notice by motion for judgment in the county court, for a considerable sum more than was due, and enforced payment. Taylor sued him at law for a reimbursement, and obtained a verdict, but could not get judgment, because it ■was a suit to recover what had been recovered by judgment. He then sued in equity, stating in his bill ail the circumstances and the court relieved him, and gave him a decree lor the excess taken from him by Wood.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

‘XKToo-d had obtained a judgment against Taylor as a collector, * ’ without giving him notice by motion for judgment in the county court, for a considerable sum more than was due, and enforced payment. Taylor sued him at law for a reimbursement, and obtained a verdict, but could not get judgment, because it ■was a suit to recover what had been recovered by judgment. He then sued in equity, stating in his bill ail the circumstances and the court relieved him, and gave him a decree lor the excess taken from him by Wood.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

3 N.C. 332, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/taylor-v-woods-executors-ncsuperct-1804.