Taylor v. Woods
23 F. Cas. 814, 3 Woods 146
Opinion
As no decree could have been rendered for the libelant by the court below, except for costs; and as the allowance or non-allowance of costs is [815] in the discretion of the court, and not a subject of appeal, the appeal must be dismissed, but without costs to either party.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Taylor v. Woods, 23 F. Cas. 814, 3 Woods 146 (circtdla 1878).
23 F. Cas. 814 (Taylor v. Woods) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
The Indian
159 F. 20 (Fifth Circuit, 1908)
Coy v. Perkins
13 F. 111 (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts, 1882)
Norton v. Hood
12 F. 763 (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Louisiana, 1882)