Taylor v. Woodlen

82 A. 85, 25 Del. 525, 2 Boyce 525, 1911 Del. LEXIS 77
Superior Court of Delaware·Decided December 19, 1911·No. No. 149·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam

The appeal is dismissed for the reason that the entry made by the justice and signed by the surety does not cover the judgment appealed from as required by the act of assembly.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Taylor v. Woodlen, 82 A. 85, 25 Del. 525, 2 Boyce 525, 1911 Del. LEXIS 77 (Del. Ct. App. 1911).

82 A. 85 (Taylor v. Woodlen) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Johnson v. Maykowski
41 A.2d 464 (Superior Court of Delaware, 1945)