Taylor v. Willamette Tractor Parts & Equipment Co.

681 P.2d 804, 68 Or. App. 452, 1984 Ore. App. LEXIS 3558
CourtCourt of Appeals of Oregon
DecidedMay 30, 1984
Docket27215; CA A29219
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 681 P.2d 804 (Taylor v. Willamette Tractor Parts & Equipment Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Taylor v. Willamette Tractor Parts & Equipment Co., 681 P.2d 804, 68 Or. App. 452, 1984 Ore. App. LEXIS 3558 (Or. Ct. App. 1984).

Opinion

PER CURIAM

Plaintiff assigns as sole error the allowance by the trial court of defendant’s motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict. Our task is to review the record to ascertain whether, viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to plaintiff, there is any evidence to support the jury verdict; if so, it must be reinstated. Jacobs v. Tidewater Barge Lines, 277 Or 809, 811, 562 P2d 545 (1977); Caldwell v. Pop’s Homes, Inc., 54 Or App 104, 106, 634 P2d 471 (1981).

On the basis of our review, we conclude that there is evidence to support the verdict and that the trial court should not have granted defendant’s motion.

Reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Sheibani v. Nelson
759 P.2d 1135 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 1988)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
681 P.2d 804, 68 Or. App. 452, 1984 Ore. App. LEXIS 3558, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/taylor-v-willamette-tractor-parts-equipment-co-orctapp-1984.