Taylor v. Warden of Maryland House of Correction

92 A.2d 757, 201 Md. 656
Court of Appeals of Maryland·Decided December 5, 1952·No. H. C. No. 21·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

Delaplaine, J.,

delivered the opinion of the Court.

This application was made by William Taylor for leave to appeal from refusal of a writ of habeas corpus.

Petitioner alleges that he was convicted in the Criminal Court of Baltimore on the charge of unauthorized use of a motor vehicle and was sentenced to the Maryland [657]*657House of Correction, but that he is being confined in that institution illegally. He complains (1) that he was held in jail for 52 days before he was tried and thus was denied the right to a speedy trial; and (2) that the bail fixed by the Court was excessive.

First, a prisoner cannot be released on habeas corpus after conviction merely because his trial was improperly delayed. Ruben v. Welch, 159 F. 2d 493.

Secondly, the fact that bail fixed by the Court was excessive does not vitiate the prisoner’s conviction and therefore cannot be raised on habeas corpus.

Application denied, with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Taylor v. Warden of Maryland House of Correction, 92 A.2d 757, 201 Md. 656 (Md. 1952).

92 A.2d 757 (Taylor v. Warden of Maryland House of Correction) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Taylor v. Warden
92 A.2d 757 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 2001)
Metalcraft, Inc. v. Pratt
500 A.2d 329 (Court of Special Appeals of Maryland, 1985)
Fairchild Stratos Corp. v. Siegler Corp.
225 F. Supp. 135 (D. Maryland, 1963)
Mack v. Maxwell
174 Ohio St. (N.S.) 275 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1963)
Harry L. Cumberland v. Warden, Maryland Penitentiary
227 F.2d 310 (Fourth Circuit, 1955)